Mugabe: divisive in life and death

8 September 2019

In the pantheon of gallant freedom fighters who staged heroic anti-colo­nial and apartheid battles on the Af­rican continent, Robert Mugabe is con­sidered both an icon and a charlatan.

To some, he is the embodiment of a rev­olutionary quest for freedom and his de­mise ought to be mourned by all who val­ue pan-Africanism and freedom. It is an undeniable fact that Mugabe, for an ex­tended period, became the single most vociferous critic of the West. While at times he spewed anti-imperialist dogma, at critical times he became the sole Af­rican leader possessed of the courage to speak obvious truths that other African leaders didn’t have the balls for.


To others, though, Mugabe was a des­pot and a mass murderer whose hands were dripping with the blood of massa­cred Matebeleland peasants, for which he deserves no forgiveness.

In life, as in death, Mugabe is a tower­ing figure of division, conjuring venera­tion and scorn. In truth, though, he is like many ordinary people who, once they’ve tasted power, find justification to hold on it, and even kill for it, before letting go.

The very fact that he died in Singapore is indicative of his health legacy for his own country. The fact that many of his country men and women are spread all over the world – desiring to be anywhere but home – attests to the ruinous nature of his politics.

The land reform he spearheaded with determination and gusto has yielded eco­nomic disrepair with run-away inflation. Yes, part of this was a result of sanctions imposed by his arch-nemesis to ensure he did not succeed. Yet, nobody can claim he covered himself in glory.

While the idea of ensuring that the wealth of the country is shared and used to benefit especially poor Zimbabweans is commendable, the implementation of the reform was riven with wanton criminality.

The beneficiaries were mostly the pet­it bourgeoisie and not ordinary Zimba­bweans with a keen interest in the utili­sation of the land. As a consequence, the agricultural sector took a knock in what used to be the bread-basket of Southern Africa, with calamitous consequences.


And therein lies a fundamental test for SA: the manner in which land reform is managed in our country will determine whether this generation bequeaths the next an economy in ruins, as Mugabe has done. That said, there is no debate in SA on whether land redistribution is required. Mugabe offers classic exam­ples of how not to do it. Mugabe did many other things wrong. From the apparent rigging of elections, the repressive laws making it hard for ordinary Zimbabwe­ans to protest peacefully without being subjected to the brute force of the notori­ous Zim police, Mugabe sealed his legacy.

Latest News