In a rapidly evolving corporate landscape, the traditional annual performance review is facing increasing scrutiny and criticism.
Advaita Naidoo, Africa managing director at Jack Hammer, the continent’s largest executive search firm, argues that the yearly ritual has lost its value, becoming a burdensome task for both employees and managers.
Naidoo emphasises the need for a paradigm shift towards a culture of constant feedback and evaluation, promoting ongoing growth and the support of employees in real time, should be the way to go.
Throughout history, the primary objective of the annual performance review has been to assess and improve employee performance. Nonetheless, Naidoo argues that this traditional approach has frequently yielded meagre results and is plagued by many difficulties.
Recognising these challenges, Naidoo proposes a shift towards a comprehensive and structured evaluation system that incorporates clearly defined objectives and behavioural patterns, reducing subjectivity to a minimum.
Naidoo emphasises that most organisations face difficulties in effectively conducting annual performance reviews. and extracting substantial value from the practice.
“The annual performance review has arguably become little more than a ritual on the yearly to-do list of most companies, and one which most people – leaders and teams alike – dread and can do without.
“Every year, millions of employees and managers across the world go through this unpleasant ritual, which was intended to measure and improve employee performance, but which ends up having little positive impact and rather more negative ones, including the fact that it is time-consuming, demotivating, subjective and often based on outdated or irrelevant criteria,” she said.
Although the annual performance review is becoming increasingly outdated, it is still important to evaluate employee performance, especially when it comes to determining rewards such as salary increases, bonuses and promotions.
However, Naidoo emphasises the necessity for improved, less burdensome, fair and equitable performance management approaches.
Naidoo highlights the significance of providing continuous feedback and assessment based on actual behaviours and outcomes, leveraging automated tools and platforms to streamline the process and enhance objectivity.
Furthermore, training managers in delivering and receiving feedback effectively can foster a supportive and non-confrontational work environment.
Furthermore, she suggests the implementation of personalised and adaptable criteria and metrics that align with individual roles and contexts, enabling a more customised approach to assessment.
By embracing these alternative strategies, organisations can cultivate a culture of continuous growth, fostering employee development and enhancing overall engagement.
Naidoo proposes that organisations can better nurture and empower their employees by ingraining continuous feedback and evaluation into their organisational culture.
This transformation eliminates the hurried and stressful nature of the annual review process and instead fosters a culture of ongoing improvement throughout the year.
She urges organisations to determine whether they can abandon the outdated practice of annual performance reviews to embrace alternative approaches that cultivate a performance-driven culture aligned with their goals.
“Organisations are advised to consider whether they can do away with the annual performance review dinosaur,” she said.
For more business news from Sunday World, click here.
Follow @SundayWorldZA on Twitter and @sundayworldza on Instagram, or like our Facebook Page, Sunday World, by clicking here for the latest breaking news in South Africa
