Central Gauteng Athletics (CGA) continues to operate as usual, despite growing scrutiny over the legitimacy of its administrator’s appointment.
In October, the Parliamentary Portfolio Committee on Sports, Arts and Culture flagged concerns that CGA Administrator Trevor Frederick’s appointment may have been irregular. Committee chairperson Joe McGluwa asked Athletics South Africa (ASA) President James Moloi to explain how Frederick was selected for the role.
Moloi told Parliament that CGA had independently decided to dissolve its board and sought ASA’s assistance in appointing an administrator.
Affordability was key in appointment
“We were requested to assist in appointing a new administrator. The ASA board, including myself, the deputy, and the CEO, met and proposed three potential candidates. One candidate requested a fee of R20, 000. And the board decided to proceed with the most affordable option,” Moloi explained.
He added that ASA’s role was limited to facilitating the process. CGA was responsible for paying the administrator’s R20, 000 fee until the next elective congress in March 2026. ASA, he said, would not interfere with CGA’s operations. And Frederick would only be required to provide progress reports to the national body.
However, Parliament remained unconvinced. Democratic Alliance MP Leah Potgieter argued that ASA had overstepped its mandate.
“CGA had requested guidance on appointing an administrator, but Athletics South Africa unilaterally made the appointment without proper consultation,” Potgieter said, stressing the need for transparency and accountability in athletics governance.
The controversy dates back to September, when Sunday World reported that CGA had been placed under administration. Acting CEO Terrence Magogodela informed members that Trevor Fredericks had been appointed to oversee CGA’s operations until fresh elections could be held.
Members not consulted
According to Magogodela, Fredericks’ mandate included ensuring smooth operations, protecting CGA’s reputation, and preparing for the election of a new board.
Despite this, CGA members expressed frustration over the appointment, claiming they were not consulted. One member, spoke anonymously.
“We were shocked to receive the letter from ASA informing us that CGA is now under administration. ASA does not have the power to appoint an administrator. They can only recommend one. We don’t understand where they got the authority to make this appointment,” CGA member told Sunday World at the time.
Repeated requests for comment from ASA and Fredericks went unanswered. The unfolding situation continues to raise questions about governance, authority, and accountability within South Africa’s athletics structures.
