UN committee says countries must consider reparations for slave trade

A United Nations (UN) committee said countries are legally obliged to consider reparations for the transatlantic slave trade and take other measures to address the enduring legacy of racial discrimination it says persists today.

Guidance published on Monday by the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination stated that the obligations arise from a legally binding 1965 convention on racial discrimination, not from the legal standards that existed when the slave trade took place.

New legal basis for reparations

The committee described the approach as a “paradigm shift” away from debates over historical responsibility that have often been used by governments to resist reparations claims.

“States Parties must implement comprehensive reparatory measures for people of African descent, covering all aspects of remedies,” said the U.N. document, which may be cited in courtrooms.

READ: UN’s declaration on slavery: What does it mean for Africa today? 

At least 12.5 million Africans were taken and sold between the 15th and 19th centuries in what the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination called the largest forced displacement in history.

Calls for reparations – ranging from official apologies to financial compensation – have gained momentum ​internationally, though opponents argue states and institutions should not be held responsible for historical crimes. The European Union and Britain abstained from a U.N. resolution on slavery in March.

Historical context and ongoing debate

Some states have sought to dodge claims for justice in courtrooms by arguing that there were no international laws outlawing the slave trade at the time – the so-called intertemporality principle.

But the U.N. document argues that, regardless of whether slavery and the slave trade were illegal under the laws of the day, countries remain responsible under current international obligations to tackle their continuing effects.

“Irrespective of the legal characterisation of the original historical acts, States Parties remain bound by their present obligations under the Convention to address structural inequalities,” the U.N. document states.

READ: Ghana’s diaspora returnees welcome UN resolution on slave trade

Financial compensation alone is not sufficient, it adds, urging “transformative” measures including opening archives, revising public memorials and establishing independent truth commissions.

Current obligations and transformative measures

Pela Boker-Wilson, a committee expert from Liberia who helped draft the document, said she expects states to move beyond broad expressions of regret and review policies and laws.

“We are calling on state parties to take concrete and meaningful action,” she told Reuters. “We want to affirm the dignity of those whose suffering was denied, whose suffering was minimised or forgotten.”

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

  • The UN's Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination stated countries are legally obliged to consider reparations for the transatlantic slave trade under the 1965 convention on racial discrimination.
  • The committee called this a "paradigm shift" away from debates on historical responsibility and urged comprehensive reparatory measures for people of African descent.
  • At least 12.5 million Africans were forcibly displaced between the 15th and 19th centuries in the transatlantic slave trade.
  • The UN document rejects the intertemporality principle argument and says states remain responsible under current obligations to address ongoing effects of slavery.
  • Reparations should include transformative actions such as opening archives, revising memorials, establishing truth commissions, and not just financial compensation.
🎧 Listen to this article

A United Nations (UN) committee said countries are legally obliged to consider reparations for the transatlantic slave trade and take other measures to address the enduring legacy of racial discrimination it says persists today.

Guidance published on Monday by the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination stated that the obligations arise from a legally binding 1965 convention on racial discrimination, not from the legal standards that existed when the slave trade took place.

The committee described the approach as a "paradigm shift" away from debates over historical responsibility that have often been used by governments to resist reparations claims.

"States Parties must implement comprehensive reparatory measures for people of African descent, covering all aspects of remedies," said the U.N. document, which may be cited in courtrooms.

READ: UN's declaration on slavery: What does it mean for Africa today? 

At least 12.5 million Africans were taken and sold between the 15th and 19th centuries in what the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination called the largest forced displacement in history.

Calls for reparations - ranging from official apologies to financial compensation - have gained momentum ​internationally, though opponents argue states and institutions should not be held responsible for historical crimes. The European Union and Britain abstained from a U.N. resolution on slavery in March.

Some states have sought to dodge claims for justice in courtrooms by arguing that there were no international laws outlawing the slave trade at the time - the so-called intertemporality principle.

But the U.N. document argues that, regardless of whether slavery and the slave trade were illegal under the laws of the day, countries remain responsible under current international obligations to tackle their continuing effects.

"Irrespective of the legal characterisation of the original historical acts, States Parties remain bound by their present obligations under the Convention to address structural inequalities," the U.N. document states.

READ: Ghana's diaspora returnees welcome UN resolution on slave trade

Financial compensation alone is not sufficient, it adds, urging "transformative" measures including opening archives, revising public memorials and establishing independent truth commissions.

Pela Boker-Wilson, a committee expert from Liberia who helped draft the document, said she expects states to move beyond broad expressions of regret and review policies and laws.

"We are calling on state parties to take concrete and meaningful action," she told Reuters. "We want to affirm the dignity of those whose suffering was denied, whose suffering was minimised or forgotten."

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.